​​ We use cookies to enhance your experience on our site. By continuing to use the site you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy & Cookies.​

Archaeopress logo
Archaeopress Publishing Ltd, Summertown Pavilion, 18-24 Middle Way, Summertown, Oxford OX2 7LG, England
tel +44 (0) 1865 311914 fax +44 (0) 1865 512231   email: info@archaeopress.com
Monthly AP Alert - join our mailing list today Archaeopress on Facebook Archaeopress on Twitter Archaeopress on Linked In Archaeopress Blog
  Browse by Subject  
  Browse by Series  
  Join Our Mailing List  
  Visit Our Blog  
  Login (Private Customers)  
  Login (Institutional Subscriptions)  
  View Basket


title, author, ISBN, keyword

Browse for books in the following languages

Ordering Information
About Us
Publish With Us
Standing Orders
Trade Sales
Contact Us
Request Review Copy
Living apart together. A ceramic analysis of Eastern Crete during the advanced Late Bronze Age
Author: Charlotte Langohr. DOI: 10.32028/9781789693775-3.ISBN 9781789693775-3.

During the Late Minoan (hereinafter LM) II to IIIB phases, roughly between 1450 and 1200 BCE, Cretan society went through a series of changes, the causes and circumstances of which are still the subject of dispute One of the key issues that remains is the question of the cultural identity or identities of Cretan communities after the widespread, violent destructions of the LM IB palatial centres and settlements on the island. This discussion involves a debate on the long-standing and complex relationship between Crete and the Mycenaean Mainland. It is generally assumed that rulers from Central Greece or at least elite groups originating from this area took over the palace at Knossos during or after the Neopalatial (Middle Minoan III-LM I) collapse (or even caused it) and gradually acquired political control over much of the island with the establishment of a new centralised, Greek-speaking administration using the script Linear B, while also initiating abrupt cultural changes within Minoan society. Integrated and comparative examinations of old and new archaeological data have allowed this historical reconstruction to be refined Indeed, in an effort to reconstruct Monopalatial (LM II-IIIA2 early) and Postpalatial (LM IIIA2-IIIB) Cretan society as a whole and this through a diachronic lens, recent studies accept both Mycenaean cultural and political interference, as well as continuous acculturation processes and hybridisation phenomena between Minoan and Mycenaean communities. In an attempt to assess the different types of interaction between Crete and the Mycenaean Mainland (and even the broader Aegean), regional and diachronic variations in sociocultural practices, primarily evident in the consumption of ceramics, have been identified through an analysis of Cretan material culture.6 These differences suggest a more subtle narrative that takes into account the different polities, materialities, and ideologies that characterise the Cretan communities throughout the period. This interpretative background helps us to consider different kinds of interactions between the communities of Crete and the Greek Mainland throughout these 250 years or so.7 These considerations about what is generally referred to as the ‘Mycenaeanisation of Crete’ deserve a more detailed explanatory framework. The section below elaborates such a framework, and allows the contextualisation of the regional definition of the LM II-IIIB ceramic traditions in East Crete, the topic of this paper.

Note for institutional subscribers: Please be sure to log in first via your institution's unique URL - this page will then display download options. If you experience difficulties logging in please consult your librarian or contact Archaeopress directly via the following email: info@archaeopress.com.

For non-subscribers, follow this link to order Journal of Greek Archaeology Volume 4, 2019.

Sorry this product is currently not available to order online. Please Contact us to purchase.

For help and information please email info@archaeopress.com